Will the US go the way of the Soviet Union?
Syed Shahid Hussain
 

United States of America has emerged as a grave threat to world peace and tranquility. It is in the interest of mankind inhabiting the globe to devise methods of controlling its aggressive impulses. It has attacked and occupied two sovereign Muslim nations in less than two years. It has thrown multilaterlism to the winds. The United Nations is more dead than alive. France, Germany and Russia tried and failed in checking the aggressive designs of this rogue power. China has been too worldly wise to run the risk of confronting the limitless military power of the US. Rest of the world is meek and will inherit the earth hereafter. Is the future for the world bleak? Not likely. Because the law of The Rise and Fall of Great Powers, as enunciated by Paul Kennedy, will apply with equal force to the United States.

Firstly, because the US has committed an act of political suicide, by attempting to occupy two sovereign Muslim nations; and secondly it has stretched itself too thin. In his mad rush to dominate the world, the President of the United States has turned his sights on Iran. Syria may be the next. Political chaos has coincided with fiscal meltdown to provide a deadly brew.                      

 

The financial cost of the foolish enterprise is proving too formidable for a weakened economy. United States is undoubtedly the most unchallenged military power. But its economy is sputtering. The living standards of the working group have stagnated or declined. Taxes are going up and services are going down and still that is not enough. Similar scenarios are being played out in state governments throughout the country. The high un-employment and sharply reduced services are taking a heavy toll on people.

 

The Fed has already cut the rate 12 times since the start of 2001. Hefty tax cuts intended to benefit the rich friends of the administration have failed to revive the economy out of deep recession. Fundamentals point to deeper malaise. According to The Economist (July 19th – 25th 2003) that all in all, stock markets seem to have got ahead of themselves. Historically, bear markets do not end until shares become truly cheap. According to Mr. Smithers, Wall Street needs to fall by a third to reach fair value-or by 60% to look as cheap as at the bottom of previous markets.

The economy has lost almost 2.5 million jobs since February 2001, more than the government admitted previously. More than 10 million workers are unemployed including 1.4 million who are un- officially counted. There are 4.8 million working part time because they can’t find full time job. Nearly a quarter of a million jobs have been lost in New York City in the past two and a half years.  Manufacturers cut jobs in May for the 34th consecutive month. Airlines and hotels continued to reduce their work force and have eliminated 8 percent of their jobs over the last two years. Public schools, department stores, and publishing and telecommunications companies have also made cuts. Even a reluctant Bush has been forced to admit that there may be a problem after all.

States have run up huge deficits. States, which depend on funding by the Federal Government for their social programmes including health and education, are bankrupt. States Business Review shows a shortfall totaling $ 21.5 billion this financial year. They have cut on the most vulnerable areas of their activities like medicines and education. An American Enterprise Institute paper, to be published this month, calculates that the present value of un-funded spending obligations, mostly for Social Security and Medicare, is more than $44 trillion.

 

             National Governors Association has announced that the fiscal crisis that has crippled one state after another is worsening, not getting better. Taxes have been raised. Services have been cut. And the rainy day funds accumulated in the 1990's have been consumed. If help does not materialize soon — in the form of assistance from the federal government or a sharp turnaround takes place in the economy — some states will fall into a fiscal abyss.

 

California has been driven to its knees by a two-year $38.8 billion budget gap. The state is now almost three weeks past the deadline for closing a budget deficit of $38 billion, the biggest in any state. By July 20th Californians may start to notice, as the unpaid highway crews stop work. This comes despite the fact that California’s credit rating is now only a little above junk, and that the north, in particular, has yet to emerge from the dotcom bust.

 

Oregon has seen drastic cuts in public school services and potentially life-saving medicine for seriously ill patients. "O‘Of all the challenges we face,’ according to the Governor, ‘none is more troubling than the fact that thousands of Oregonians — many of them children — don't have enough to eat. Oregon has the highest hunger rate in the nation.’  

Federal spending has increased by 18% in Mr. Bush’s first two years. Some $2 trillion worth tax cuts over the next ten years have been given to the Americans. But they also got huge budget deficits in return. Since the budget was proposed in February, the projected deficit has increased from $304 billion for this fiscal year to $455 billion. The deficit is 50% larger than the $304 billion forecast in February That is 4.2% of GDP, less than the 6% reached under Ronald Reagan, and the figure will eventually fall as the economy recovers, but there will be no return to surplus.     

           

            Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has announced that this year’s budget deficit will be $455 billion, the largest ever in dollar terms. Are the OMB’s long-term projections to be believed? The deficit may turn out to be higher. As a share of GDP, there has been a six percentage-point decline from the 2000 budget surplus. Its figures do not include the cost of keeping soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq beyond 2003. And the “sunset provisions”, phasing out some of Mr. Bush’s tax cuts, will probably never go into effect. The nonmilitary component has been rising by more than 6% a year, which makes blaming it all on the war on terror seem strange. And the forecasts do not include the costs of war in Iraq, nor the duration of the unwelcome stay there.

 

According to The Economist (July 19th – 25th 2003), America’s recovery is its weakest in modern times, and inflation is unusually low. As a result, nominal GDP has grown at an annual rate of less than 4% since output bottomed in the third quarter of 2001, compared with an average 9% rate in the two years after the previous eight recessions ended. Today’s forecasts of double-digit profit growth in the next few years look unrealistic.

But terrorism has not gone away. The policy is not succeeding, because the solution is misplaced. The difficulties the sole superpower faces in both the occupied countries are going to increase rather than go away. And the body bags, small though in number, will help change the public opinion within the US because the occupation makes no sense to them. Since the liberation of Iraq about 100 American soldiers have been killed in Iraq. Even in the most patriotic part of the United States, like the state of Mississippi rumbling of protest has started being heard. George Bush, whose popularity rating was very high until some time back, is no longer riding the crest of popularity and appears vulnerable to the charge of exaggerating the case for war by basing it on Weapons of Mass Destruction. So was his dad’s at this point in time before the next election. He lost by little known candidate from Arkansas.

As Mr. Bush moves from fund-raiser to fund-raiser, building the mother of all campaign stockpiles, states from coast to coast are reaching depths of budget desperation unseen since the Great Depression. The disconnect here is becoming surreal. If Bush wins another term, the demise of the US as a super power may be only a foregone conclusion. And a multilateral world subject to international law may be in place.